Petitioners sought a direction for early disposal of an application filed under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act from 33 years ago. The court was disinclined to entertain the writ petition due to the significant delay and dismissed it.
Writ petition dismissed due to the significant delay of 33 years in seeking the direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10154 of 2020
Petitioner :- Hari Prakash And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 23.6.2020 Prakhar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court can entertain a writ petition seeking a mandamus for early disposal of an application filed 33 years ago.
Whether the limitation period hindered the court from granting relief to the petitioners.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hari Prakash And 7 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
