The High Court court held a writ petition seeking mandamus to prevent interference in land possession during a pending civil suit as misconceived and accordingly dismissed it.
Petitioner's application for mandamus preventing interference in possession over disputed land during pending civil suit was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9759 of 2020
Petitioner :- Ramsakhi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Braj Mohan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
The petitioner has filed a Civil Suit No.852 of 2019 (Smt. Ramsakhi & others Vs. Gangadeen & others). The prayer to seek mandamus commanding the respondents not to interfere in her possession over the disputed land being subject matter of the civil suit is found misconceived.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed .
Order Date :- 22.6.2020 Himanshu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking mandamus to prevent interference in possession of disputed land during a pending civil suit is maintainable.
Ramsakhi
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
