Santosh Kumar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition disposed of without examining issue of delay. Competent authority to decide grievance accordingly.
What the court decided
Court No. - 83
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8718 of 2020 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Learned Standing Counsel contends that the grievances of the petitioner shall be attended to by the competent authority in accordance with law.
This Court has not gone into the issue of delay and laches. It is for the competent authority to consider the issue while deciding the grievance of the petitioner.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 19.10.2020 Pravin
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Santosh Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Ajay Bhanot
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/8718/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court