Akshat Saxena v. Union of India Ministry of Railway and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition, the petitioner Avin disputed requiring fresh appeal on administrative remedy. The court deferred to the respondent's proposition that the Central Administrative Tribunal could redress grievances thereby granting liberty to seek remedy before said Tribunal upon走高 if so advised.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to approach Central Administrative Tribunal to seek remedy if so advised.