Court held it lacked jurisdiction regarding a writ petition posted at Lucknow and dismissed the petition, directing the petitioner to approach the Lucknow Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6217 of 2020 Petitioner :- Divyanshi Pandey (Minor) And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jeetendra Singh,Mithilesh Kumar Rai,Ravi Shankar Prasad(Senior Adv.) Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
The respondent no. 6 is posted at Lucknow. This court does not have the jurisdiction to entertain this writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed.
It is open to the petitioner to approach the Lucknow Bench, of the Allahabad High Court.
Order Date :- 8.10.2020 Pravin
Divyanshi Pandey
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
