Ramakant Yadav and 8 Others v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Termination of appointment — writ petition disposed of on consent — questions arising from impugned order of termination held settled by Prashant Kumar Jaiswal v. State of U.P., [2018 (2) ADJ 633], affirmed by Supreme Court judgment dated 16 December 2019 in Civil Appeal No. 9026 of 2019 (Mukul Kumar Tyagi) with Civil Appeal Nos. 9027 of 2019 (Rajiv Kumar) and 9028 of 2019 (Ravi Prakash) — petitioners' claims to be evaluated per Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited decision dated 10 February 2020, decision to be communicated within two months — all contentions kept open — Ramakant Yadav and 8 others v. State of U.P. and 5 others — WRIT - A No. 5106 of 2020 — decided 8.7.2020 — Yashwant Varma, J.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of in the above terms: subject to verification of all facts and with all contentions of the respective parties kept open, the petitioners' claims are to be duly evaluated in terms of the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited decision dated 10 February 2020, with a decision to be communicated to the petitioners within a period of two months therefrom.