Petitioner moved to dismiss a writ petition in light of a concurrent order. The single-judge bench allowed the dismissal based on reasoning provided in a previously disposed concurrent petition.
Petitioner's writ petition is dismissed with no reasons stated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 502 of 2019
Petitioner :- Sadhan Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Mainpuri Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Mohan Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Lal
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Learned counsel for parties are ad idem that this petition would merit dismissal in light of the order dated 29 January 2020 passed on Writ-A No. 2932 of 2019 [Sadhan Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Bairani Sanaura Block Khairgarh Firozabad v. State of U.P. And Others].
Accordingly and for reasons assigned therein, this petition shall also stand dismissed .
Order Date :- 13.2.2020 faraz
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sadhan Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Bairani Sanaura Block Khairgarh Firozabad v. State of U.P. And OthersFollowed¶4
Writ-A No. 2932 of 2019 [Sadhan Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Bairani Sanaura Block Khairgarh Firozabad v. State of U.P. And Others]
Sadhan Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Mainpuri
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
