Writ petition dismissed by the High Court for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear to press the matter in the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18125 of 2011
Petitioner :- Vinay Kunj Yadav Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare,Shri Ashok Khare Counsel for Respondent :- C. S. C.,Balwant Singh,G.K.Singh,Ramesh Upadhyay,Satyawan Singh,V.K.Singh
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
None has appeared for the petitioner to press the petition even when the matter is taken up in the revised call. Consequently this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 12.2.2020 Vivek Kr.
Vinay Kunj Yadav
State of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
