None appeared for the petitioner to press this writ petition. The bench held that the matter had become infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 44360 of 2005
Petitioner :- Jamshed Ali Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.A. Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 4.2.2020 KA
Jamshed Ali
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
