The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to regularize his appointment as Collection Amin in District Kanpur Nagar. The court rejected the plea as the petitioner failed to substantiate any provision for regularization and could not challenge the lawful appointments of his seniors.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11031 of 2005 Petitioner :- Vishwajeet Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Radha Kant Ojha,G.S. Dwivedi,V.S. Parmar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Q.H.Parmar,Q.H.Siddiqui
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 29.1.2020 PS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be regularized as Collection Amin consequent upon the appointment of his juniors.
Whether the petitioner can claim appointment against vacancies held by persons who were lawfully appointed under the Rules, 1974.
Vishwajeet
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
