Paragraphs 7 and 8 describe the dismissal of a writ petition (Writ - A No. 23905 of 2005) as the cause of action likely no longer survives or has become infructuous. Counsel for the absent petitioner did not appear, and the petitioner lost interest.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 23905 of 2005
Petitioner :- Rohitas
Respondent :- Executive Officer Nagar Panchayat Auraiya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.M. Sahai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,V.K.Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 29.1.2020 PS
Rohitas
Executive Officer Nagar Panchayat Auraiya
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
