Petitioner failed to appear and prosecute the writ petition. Court dismissed the petition for lack of prosecution due to repeated failures to respond to high court notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 42
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4165 of 2020
Petitioner :- Shivam Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Kant Jha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
On 11.06.2020, the following order was passed:
"List of fresh cases has been revised.
Despite repeated calls none appears to press this petition on behalf of the petitioner.
List in the third week of July, 2020."
Today, again no one is present even in revised call to press this petition.
It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter.
It is dismissed accordingly.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.)
Order Date :- 13.7.2020 Chandan
Shivam Gupta
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
