Chandrama Maurya v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This court noted that the applicant in the quashing petition had already been arrested, rendering the petition infructuous.
This court noted that the applicant in the quashing petition had already been arrested, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11936 of 2020
Applicant :- Chandrama Maurya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Kumar Singh,Sharad Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Sri Arvind Singh Advocate has filed his appearance on behalf of opposite party no.2.
Sri Atul Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has since been arrested, therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous.
It is dismissed accordingly.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J)
Order Date :- 10.7.2020 SL
Chandrama Maurya
State of U.P.
Another
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court