The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant had no counsel present and appeared to be out of interest in pursuing the matter.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 113 of 2018
Appellant :- Lakhan Singh (Deceased) And 3 Others Respondent :- Mahesh Chandra Agarwal And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Vibhav Dutt Ojha,Sushil Jaiswal,Vaibhav Dutt Ojha,Vishnu Dutt Ojha
Counsel for Respondent :- Rama Goel Bansal
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None for the appellant even when the list was revised. Ms. Shalini Gupta for the respondent. Nobody was present for the appellant when this matter was taken up on 6.2.2020. It appears that appellant has lost interest in pursuing the appeal as nobody is appearing today also. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 13.2.2020 S.K.S.
Lakhan Singh
Mahesh Chandra Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
