Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to repeated adjournment requests by counsel not addressing the court by the last date.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 84 of 2018
Appellant :- Manjeet Kaur Respondent :- Chief Veterinary Officer Counsel for Appellant :- Mr Virendra Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None for the appellant.
On the last date the case was adjourned on the request of Sri Virendra Singh, counsel for the appellant who had sought adjournment to prepare the matter and address the court. Sri Virendra Singh is continuously taking adjournments on several dates i.e. 3.5.2018, 5.4.2018, 24.1.2018, and 12.2.2018. It appears that Sri Virendra Singh has lost interest in pursuing the appeal and is not appearing to address the court on admission.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 12.2.2020 S.K.S.
Manjeet Kaur
Chief Veterinary Officer
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
