Brijnandan Goyal and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous since the charge sheet had been submitted in the case.
The court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous since the charge sheet had been submitted in the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8335 of 2020
Petitioner :- Brijnandan Goyal And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Sri Rohit Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners state that charge sheet has been submitted in the present case, hence the present petition has become infructuous.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 27.8.2020 SA
(Ajit Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Brijnandan Goyal And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court