Reema Maurya v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous writ of habeas corpus dismissed as the petitioner had already been released before the hearing.
Infructuous writ of habeas corpus dismissed as the petitioner had already been released before the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 254 of 2020
Petitioner :- Reema Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Sri D.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present habeas corpus petition has become infructuous as the corpus-petitioner has already been released. Sri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ajit Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 26.8.2020 Shiraz
Reema Maurya
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court