This is a habeas corpus petition where the court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the first petitioner had already been released.
The habeas corpus petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 375 of 2020
Petitioner :- Surekha Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Sri Anand Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present habeas corpus petition has become infructuous as the corpuspetitioner no. 1 has already been released. Ms. Archana Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present habeas corpus petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ajit Singh, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 26.8.2020 Shiraz
Surekha Yadav
Another
State Of U P
Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
