This revision was filed questioning an order issuing notice on an interim injunction application. The court held such revisions are not maintainable as the order does not amount to a case decided under Section 115 CPC, dismissing the petition.
Revision dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 49 of 2020
Revisionist :- Sri Rajat Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- Sri Mukesh Kumar And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Vijendra Pal Singh,Smt. Krishna Singh
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionists.
This revision is directed against an order issuing notice on an interim injunction application.
It is settled law and is admitted by learned counsel for the revisionists that a revision against an order issuing notice on an interim injunction application, is not maintainable. Such an order does not amount to a case decided within the meaning of the term under Section 115 C.P.C.
Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as not maintainable.
Order Date :- 14.10.2020 Mayank
Digitally signed by Justice Anjani Kumar Mishra Date: 2020.10.15 11:12:55 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision is maintainable against an order issuing notice on an interim injunction application.
Sri Rajat Kumar And 2 Others
Sri Mukesh Kumar And Another
Anjani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
