Siraj v. State of U.P.

Court No. - 76 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2542 of 2020

Applicant :- Siraj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Zafar Abbas Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Meraj Ahmad Khan

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel on behalf of opposite party and Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State, learned counsel for the complainant and perused the record.

The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present due to ulterior motive. Nothing has been recovered from the possession or pointing out of the applicant. All the injuries of alleged person are simple in nature. Criminal history of the applicant has properly been explained in para 15 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. The applicant is languishing in jail since 31.10.2019. He undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted, therefore, he may be released on bail.

Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party and learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer.

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and