High Court bench rejected the bail application filed by Sushil Gayakwad in a criminal case under multiple IPC sections, finding no grounds for bail and directing the trial court to expedite proceedings.
Bail application rejected; trial court directed to expeditiously conclude trial within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 76
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10098 of 2020
Applicant :- Sushil Gayakwad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vishwa Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Aniruddh Tiwari,Varun Dev Sharma
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
2. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.339 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 354-Kha, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Keedganj, District Allahabad.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A., and after perusing the averments made in the present bail application as well as rejection order, this Court is of the opinion, that learned counsel for the applicant could not point out any good ground for grant of bail to the applicant.
4. Accordingly, the bail application filed on behalf of the applicant is hereby rejected .
Order Date :- 9.9.2020 Dev/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in the present criminal case under the relevant sections of the IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sushil Gayakwad
State of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
