Rajendra Singh v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous because applicant died during parole. No substantive legal issue or precedent discussed.
Bail application dismissed as infructuous because applicant died during parole. No substantive legal issue or precedent discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 76
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12398 of 2020
Applicant :- Rajendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Pratibha Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
A report has been submitted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah dated 11.06.2020. In the said report it has been submitted that applicant has died during parole. Hence, bail application of the applicant has become infructuous.
The bail application is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.9.2020 Arti
Rajendra Singh
State of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court