The Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Ankit Mishra. Despite claims of innocent implication, the Court found no good ground for bail given the gravity of the accusation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 654 of 2020
Applicant :- Ankit Mishra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dewarshi Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anurag Prasad
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
The medical report shows injury damaging Corneal tear. It is urged that the role of causing injury has not been assigned to the applicant; applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the instant case.
Learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for bail.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the submission advanced, the nature and gravity of the accusation, I find no good ground for grant of bail to the applicants Ankit Mishra , involved in Case Crime No. 842 of 2019, under Sections 326, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Karvi Kotwali Nagar, District Chitrakoot.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected.
Order Date :- 27.1.2020 S.Prakash
2 issues framed by the court
Whether grant of anticipatory bail is deserving in an alleged offence causing injury to cornea.
Whether the implicated applicant is an innocent person falsely implicated.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ankit Mishra
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
