Manoj Verma and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for anticipatory bail regarding alleged offenses under Sections 307, 324, 504 IPC was rejected. The court noted injury reports supported the occurrence despite applicant's claim of a civil dispute and denial of the incident.
What the court decided
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5617 of 2020
Applicant :- Manoj Verma And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
- This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants - Manoj Verma, Vishnu Verma, Vikki Verma @ Ashish Soni and Golu Verma @ Shivam Verma, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.0885 of 2019, under Sections 307, 324, 504 I.P.C., Police Station New Agra, District Agra, during the pendency of trial.
- Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the F.I.R. allegations are completely false and a civil dispute exists between the parties with respect to a shop. Further, it has been submitted that the allegations are completely false inasmuch as applicant had sold the house. The applicant stated that no incident had taken place on 26.11.2019.
- At present there is nothing to plainly doubt the occurrence inasmuch as the F.I.R. allegations appear to be supported by the injury report which has also been annexed to the present application.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given unsupported denial of incident alleged in FIR.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Manoj Verma and 3 Others
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/5617/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court