Dismissed
Kripal Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCABAIL/4493/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4493 of 2020
Applicant :- Kripal Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Sri Sushil Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants states that during pendency of the present application, the closure report has been submitted by the police under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. Accordingly, the present application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present applicant is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.10.2020 Atul
Kripal Singh And Another
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court