Application sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Dismissed as infructuous because the applicant was already in custody, leading to the application becoming redundant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4908 of 2020
Applicant :- Hasam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vidit Narayan Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Sri Vidit Narayan Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant has been arrested during the pendency of this application.
In view of the above, the present application is rendered infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 21.10.2020 Atul
Hasam
State of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
