Single judge rejected an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest under delayed sections 498A etc.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3267 of 2020
Applicant :- Vidhya Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunder Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in light of the apprehension of the arrest of the applicant in Case Crime No. 27 of 2020, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 364 IPC, Police Station Bhopa, District Muzaffar Nagar.
The Court finds no ground to accord the facility of anticipatory bail to the applicant bearing in mind the serious allegations which are levelled in the first information report coupled with the fact that the whereabouts of the estranged wife is yet to be verified. The wife is stated to have gone missing in June 2019. The prayer so made is refused.
The application consequently stands rejected . Order Date :- 12.10.2020 faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is warranted given serious allegations and missing spouse.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vidhya Devi
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
