The High Court directed the trial court in a Section 138 NI Act complaint case to dispose of the matter expeditiously, preferably within six months, citing no legal impediment.
Referred the underlying compromise section 138 NI Act case to the trial court for expeditious disposal within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18283 of 2020
Applicant :- Ravi Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Neha Gupta,Ajay Vir Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the record with the assistance of learned counsel for the parties.
By means of this application, the applicant has prayed for expeditious disposal of case being Complaint Case No. 1412 of 2018 (Ravi Sharma vs Piyush Gupta), under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, police station Lohamandi, district Agra pending in the court of Additional court No.2, Agra.
Learned AGA states that no useful purpose would be served in issuing notice to opposite party and keeping this application pending before this Court and it may be disposed of at this stage itself.
Considering the limited grievance of the learned counsel for the applicant, learned trial court is directed to make an endeavour to decide the aforesaid case, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before it, if there is no legal impediment.
With the aforesaid directions, this application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 10.12.2020 Sazia
Ravi Sharma
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
