Court dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. application for want of prosecution as counsel for the applicant did not appear despite repeated calls. Any interim order stood vacated.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14301 of 2017
Applicant :- Sumit Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sumit Kumar Srivastava,Sanjeev Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anil Kumar Dubey,Vinay Kumar
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicants inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicants.
Sri Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 29.1.2020
ss
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sumit Singh
State of U.P.
Om Prakash-VII,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
