Writ petition under Article 227 was dismissed as having become infructuous per the petitioner's counsel. No liberty was given to file a fresh petition.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 193 of 2020
Petitioner :- Chhotu Yadav @ Satendra Yadav (Minor) Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Singh,Dadhi Bal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Shri Dadhi Bal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner states that present petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
In view of the statement made, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
It is made clear that no liberty is being given to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
Order Date :- 28.1.2020
safi
Chhotu Yadav
State Of U.P.
Om Prakash-VII
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
