Application under Section 482 of CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicants, initiated no adjournment requests, despite repeated calls by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 377 of 2017
Applicant :- Mohd. Irfan And 2 Ors. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the applicants in spite of repeated calls. There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicants. The application is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Office to communicate this order to the Court below within a week.
Order Date :- 29.1.2020 safi
Mohd. Irfan And 2 Ors.
Om Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
