Ram Dulari Vs Narendra Singh and 4 Others

Court No. - 81

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2164 of 2020

Petitioner :- Ram Dulari Respondent :- Narendra Singh And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishnu Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Sunil Kumar Misra

¶4

Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.

¶5

Heard the counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sunil Kumar Misra, Advocate, representing respondent nos. 3 and 4.

¶6

The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 24.5.2019 passed by Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chhibramau, Kannauj passed in original suit no. 75 of 2019, whereby the trial court has rejected the application filed by the petitioner for filing fresh documentary evidence.

¶7

Against the order of the trial court, the petitioner filed revision numbered as Civil Revision No. 23 of 2019, which has been dismissed by the revisional court vide order dated 1.2.2020.

¶8

In case the trial court decides original suit no. 75 of 2019 against the petitioner, the petitioner shall have a remedy to challenge the order dated 24.5.2019 passed by the trial court in the appeal filed against the decree.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid, it is not a fit case for interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India at this stage.

¶10

The writ petition lacks merit, and is, accordingly dismissed .

¶11

Order Date :- 22.6.2020 Anurag/-

Ram Dulari v. Narendra Singh and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Dulari v. Narendra Singh and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Bhrigurasan and 2 Ors. Vs D.D.C. and 2 Ors.

Tufail Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nafees Ajami Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Amreeta Vs Addi. Commissioner (Judicial) 4TH,MEERUT Division and 8 Others

Phool Chand Vs Board of Revenue and Another