Disposed

Vishun Pal Singh v. State of U P and 2 Others

Allahabad HC15 Mar 2019WRIC/9273/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition was disposed of, directing the petitioner to deposit the outstanding bank loan in five installments. The order mandates the bank to provide a clear statement of account detailing disbursed amounts, repaid sums, and interest charges.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to deposit amount due in five installments; Bank to provide simplified account statement; No further recovery action if amounts are deposited.

Vishun Pal Singh Vs State of U P and 2… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 28

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9273 of 2019

¶3

Petitioner :- Vishun Pal Singh Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Beerendra Pratap Singh,Indra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satish Chaturvedi

¶4

Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

¶5

Heard Shri Indra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Shri Satish Chaturvedi, counsel for the respondentbank.

¶6

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being finally disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

¶7

By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing recovery certificate dated 07.02.2019 for Rs.5,34,170/- plus other charges.

¶8

The petitioner had taken a loan of Rs. 2,25,000/- for agricultural purpose. It is admitted to the petitioner that a default has been committed by the petitioner in making timely repayments of that loan. Consequently, recovery proceedings have been initiated against him.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to deposit the entire recovery amount within the time fixed by this Court.

¶10

Learned counsel appearing for the bank fairly states that the bank is interested in realizing the entire amount alongwith interest. If the petitioner deposits the amount within the time allowed by this Court, no further action shall be taken against the petitioner by the bank.

¶11

On the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶12

(i) The petitioner shall deposit the entire amount due to the bank in five installments beginning from 15.4.2019.

¶13

(ii) By way of first installment, the petitioner shall deposit

¶14

Rs. 1,25,000/- on or before the date 15.4.2019.

¶15

(iii) On depositing the aforesaid amount of Rs. 1,25,000/-, the respondent bank shall provide a statement of account to the petitioner within two weeks thereafter disclosing the exact amount disbursed by the bank as loan; exact amount/s repaid by the petitioner together with dates of deposit; rate of interest and amount/s of interest charged by the bank. Such statement be expressed in such terms/language as may be easy to comprehend even by a lay-man such as the petitioner.

¶16

(iv) The bank shall in the statement so supplied, itself calculate & indicate the amount/s of each installment together with the date of payments due.

¶17

(v) Thus, the balance amount so indicated by the bank shall be deposited by the petitioner through the remaining four equal quarterly installments from 15.7.2019 onwards.

¶18

(vi) If the entire amount is deposited by the petitioner as directed above, no recovery charge shall be realized from the petitioner.

¶19

(vii) In case of default of the conditions as mentioned above, the present order shall stand automatically vacated and recovery proceedings shall revive from that stage.

¶20

Order Date :- 15.3.2019 A.N. Mishra

Vishun Pal Singh v. State of U P and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishun Pal Singh v. State of U P and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Sahai Vs State of U.P. through Principal Secretary Cooperative, Lucknow and 4 Others

Shabihul Hasan Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Om Prakash Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vijay Singh Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Abhinandan Prajapati Vs Assistant Registrar Firms Societies and Chits and 3 Others

Jalleel Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and Another