Writ petition filed by Ummed remained in Peninsula Bengali Court No. 1 as of 2019 leading to dismissal due to lack of appearance by the petitioner or their counsel, rendering the petition infructuous. No further hearing was held on the matter.
dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous upon non-appearance by petitioner
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3969 of 2010
Petitioner :- Ummed Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Bhardwaj Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List revised.
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition, meaning thereby, that petitioner is no longer interested to press it and that it has been rendered infructuous.
Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel is present on behalf of the State.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 16.12.2019 IrfanUddin
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Ummed
State of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
