The High Court found the writ petition infructuous and dismissed it accordingly. No substantive legal proposition or reasoning is recorded in this short order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 64750 of 2009
Petitioner :- M/S Jagdish Organic And Chemicals And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Arun Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dr. Hari Nath Tripathi
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
None appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition.
Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Sri H. N. Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent No.4 states that the matter has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 18.10.2019 Nitin Verma
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
M/S Jagdish Organic And Chemicals And Another
State Of U.P. And Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
