Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioner was absent. No substantive law or merits were considered by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26585 of 2009
Petitioner :- Phool Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- I.B. Yadav,S.K. Agrawal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 17.10.2019 Nitin Verma
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Phool Singh
State Of U.P.
Another
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
