No one appeared for the petitioner. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim order was vacated.
Nothing of general legal application deliberated; case dismissed for non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30514 of 2009
Petitioner :- Adya Prasad And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kesarwani,R.S. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shiv Nath Singh
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Sri Satyam Singh holding brief of Sri Shiv Nath Singh, learned counsel for the respondent and Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State are present.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 17.10.2019 Nitin Verma
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Adya Prasad And Others
State Of U.P. And Others
Ajit Kumar
Ramesh Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
