The High Court declined to direct expeditious disposal of a pending Mutation Case under the U.P. Revenue Code, noting no valid ground for intervention, while leaving the petitioner liberty to request the authority.
Liberty granted to petitioner to request concerned authority for expeditious disposal of the mutation case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5613 of 2019
Petitioner :- Mahajadiya Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Omkar Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the State.
The only relief pressed in this petition is that Mutation Case No.T201805440303423 (Smt. Mahajadiay Devi Vs. Rajesh Kumar) under Section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending before the respondent no.1 since 25.4.2018, may be directed to be decided expeditiously.
I do not find any good reason to direct the concerned respondent for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid case. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed .
Liberty is granted to the petitioner to request the concerned authority for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid case.
Order Date :- 18.2.2019 Vivek Kr.
Mahajadiya Devi
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
