The court dismissed the testamentary petitions as withdrawn and rejected the amendment application with liberty to file a fresh petition due to omission of important facts.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; amendment application rejected; liberty granted to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- TESTAMENTARY CASES No. - 5 of 2019
Petitioner :- Surendra Pratap Singh In The Matter Of The Goods Of Late Dharmvir Singh Respondent :- Na Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Dubey
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Sri Rajesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner states that inadvertently certain important facts could not be stated in the petition and, therefore, this petition as well as the amendment application both may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition. The amendment application is also rejected.
Order Date :- 18.2.2019 Ak/
Surendra Pratap Singh
Na
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
