The bench of Sudhir Agarwal and Virendra Kumar Srivastava allowed the writ petition, holding that the issue was covered by the final judgment in Writ Petition No. 11973 of 1999 and ordered disposal on the same terms.
This writ petition is allowed on the same terms as the judgment in Writ Petition No. 11973 of 1999.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5594 of 2019
Petitioner :- Man Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Swatantra Pratap Singh,Krishna Mohan Misra,Sri V K Singh (Senior Advocate) Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh,Ramendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Virendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 20.5.2019 Saurabh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed based on the existing final judgment in Writ Petition No. 11973 of 1999.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ram Narayan Misra and others vs. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and anotherFollowed¶6
Ram Narayan Misra and others vs. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and another
Man Singh
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Virendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
