In a dismissed special appeal, this court held that the respondent's regularization made the appeal infructuous, and dismissed it via a two-line order vacating any interim orders.
Special appeal dismissed on the ground of regularization of the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 272 of 2008
Appellant :- State Of U.P. And Others Respondent :- Vijay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Appellant :- M.C. Chaturvedi C.S.C. Counsel for Respondent :- Pankaj Srivastava
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Virendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 17.5.2019 Saurabh
State Of U.P. And Others
Vijay Kumar Srivastava
Sudhir Agarwal
Virendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
