Special Appellant prayed for extension of interim order; Court held that order already allowed only up to next listing and not extended thereafter, rendering appeal infructuous.
Special Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 435 of 2019 Appellant :- Karan Prakash Respondent :- Committee Of Management,Colonelganj Inter College And 5 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Vimal Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vijay Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Virendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
1.Heard Sri Vimal Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for appellant, Sri Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents and learned A.G. A for State.
2.Interim order dated 10.10.2018 passed by this Court was allowed up to the next date of listing but the same was not extended thereafter.Therefore, this special appeal is rendered infractuous.
Order Date :- 17.5.2019
G.S
Karan Prakash
Committee Of Management,Colonelganj Inter College
Sudhir Agarwal
Virendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
