Sunita v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a demand notice under Rule 141(3) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Holding that subsequent consequential orders cannot be challenged without challenging the basic order, the court found no ground for interference amidst demonstrated default.
What did the court decide?
The demand notice/citation under Rule 141(3) was upheld; no relief granted to the petitioner.