The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the sons of an auction purchaser. The court held that the cancellation order had attained finality and the dispute regarding the property was sub judice in an original suit filed earlier by the deceased purchaser.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3610 of 2019
Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar And Another Respondent :- U P Financial Corporation And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Sinha,Mahesh Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- Ravindra Singh,Pranjal Mehrotra,Ravindra Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
by a speaking and reasoned order. Thereafter, impugned order has been passed by the Regional Manager.
Order Date :- 13.2.2019 I.A.Siddiqui
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition can be maintained against the cancelled sale order and resale by the Financial Corporation.
Whether consequential relief can be granted in the writ petition when the dispute regarding property is the subject matter of a civil suit.
Rajeev Kumar and Another
U P Financial Corporation and Another
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
