The High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel was absent. Any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 51981 of 2009
Petitioner :- Guljari Lal Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Mandhyan,Prashant Mishra,R.Maurya,Rahul Srivastava,Saumya Mandhyan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.Raza,A.S. Rana,Komal Mehrotra,Srikant,Syed Imtiyaz Ali,Vijit Saxena
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition whereas learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.11.2019 Sanjeev
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Guljari Lal
State of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
