This court dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time. The interim order, if any, was vacated. The petitioners were given liberty to move an appropriate application within six weeks if the matter survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21608 of 2015
Petitioner :- Abid And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lalit Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate,Sayeed Saif Ullah,Sufia Saba
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No is present on behalf of either of the parties. Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
It appears from the record that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
However, it will be open for the parties to move appropriate application within six weeks' from today, if the matter survives.
(Ajit Kumar, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 20.11.2019 Shiraz
Abid And 5 Others
State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 3 Others
Ramesh Sinha
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
