The High Court dismissed Writ Petition C No. 51153 of 2006 after finding the cause of action likely extinguished or the matter infructuous, noting no instructions from counsel.
The writ petition was dismissed and any interim orders were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 51153 of 2006
Petitioner :- Tayal Steels Pvt. Ltd. Respondent :- U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bidhan Chandra Rai Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,A.K. Mehrotra,A.N. Singh,Rajeshwar Yadav,S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 20.9.2019 Ram Murti
Tayal Steels Pvt. Ltd.
U.P. Power Corporation Ltd.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
