Special appeal against dismissal for want of prosecution of a condonation application. This court held the special appeal itself was barred by limitation and dismissed it.
The special appeal was dismissed as it was barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 757 of 2019
Appellant :- Raghubir Singh Respondent :- Shri Hemant Kumar,Collector And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Akhilesh Tripathi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
In Re : Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.1 of 2019
Order Date :- 19.9.2019 Manish Himwan
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 757 of 2019
Appellant :- Raghubir Singh Respondent :- Shri Hemant Kumar,Collector And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Akhilesh Tripathi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
The application, seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal, having been dismissed vide order of date, this appeal, being barred by limitation, is also dismissed.
Order Date :- 19.9.2019 Manish Himwan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a special appeal filed after the original application was dismissed for want of prosecution is barred by limitation.
Whether the dismissal of the original condonation application bars the special appeal sought against such dismissal.
Raghubir Singh
Shri Hemant Kumar, Collector And 2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
