This is an appeal challenging interim maintenance awarded by the Family Court. The court applied Order 41 Rule 11 CPC and dismissed the appeal, holding the maintenance not excessive.
The appeal was dismissed at the stage of hearing under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 223 of 2019 Appellant :- Manveer Singh Saini Respondent :- Usha Rani Counsel for Appellant :- Mohammad Zakir
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Ref: Civil Misc Delay Condonation Application No. 1 of 2019
Order Date :- 20.9.2019 Ram Murti
Court No. - 34
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 223 of 2019 Appellant :- Manveer Singh Saini Respondent :- Usha Rani Counsel for Appellant :- Mohammad Zakir
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 20.9.2019
Ram Murti
2 issues framed by the court
Whether excess maintenance awarded by the Family Court warrants interference under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC.
Whether the appeal lacks merits as prayed under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Manveer Singh Saini
Usha Rani
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
