The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the respondent counsel informed the Court that a final decision had already been taken and an order was placed before the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 43244 of 2018
Petitioner :- Baij Nath And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Narain Singh,M.N. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Neeraj Tripathi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
3.In view of above, this writ petition as stands today, has rendered infructuous.
Order Date :- 3.1.2019
Akram
Baij Nath And 5 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
